Talk:psitta

RFD discussion: November 2018–October 2019
RFD of the second sense, which is just an etymological element that does not exist on its own. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:32, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You mean something like a prefix or suffix? Perhaps we should just move it to -psitta DCDuring (talk) 02:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You know, that's probably a good call. I support that suggestion, instead of deleting it. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)


 * RFD deleted (content already at -psitta). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

RFV discussion: November 2018–December 2019
Rfv-sense for the specific epithet. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Aspelta psitta is a rotifer, and Psittocythere psitta is a crayfish. Either is specifically not a parrot. --Lambiam 15:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I expect that there is some parrot-like feature of the organisms with that epithet. I can usually find images that support that kind of thing. DCDuring (talk) 02:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Since it's been deleted through RFD, I guess the question is mute. RFV resolved.__Gamren (talk) 21:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)