Talk:publika ĝardeno

publikajn ĝardenojn
SOP. 2600:1000:B111:FB4A:B04B:1245:328E:5BE4 10:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * A public garden is not necessarily a park, and a park is not necessarily a public garden.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Just “park” is not a good definition. A better definition is “” (which is always public), also called “public garden(s)” – I think the plural form is more common in English usage. --Lambiam 11:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Urban parks aren't always public; there's at least one near me limited to the local homeowners. I'm not familiar with the phrase "public gardens" and using the phrase "garden" to refer to a place with mowed grass and tennis and basketball courts strikes me as wrong. A local park has gardens, where people can grow vegetables. Some of this might be my idiolect or American English, but if this is deleted as SOP, I'd like to see clarification on ĝardeno.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:07, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * As seen here in British use, this “Public Gardens” (note that this is grammatically treated as a singular) is really a park (where one would not be allowed to grow veggies), complete with children’s play area and bowling green. In US use, “public garden” appears to mean what I’d call a botanical garden, at least according to the American Public Gardens Association. I think that a park in an urban environment with access restricted to residents, such as Gramercy Park in NY, would be called a (private) neighborhood park; most definitions of “urban park” define it as a public space, like here: “Urban parks are accessible to the public.” --Lambiam 09:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * When I said "A local park has gardens", I think it sounded more general than I was saying; one of my local parks has a small gated area where people can grow vegetables. (Accessible by request and assignment of space only.) Unless public gardens are more limited in Britain than parks are in the US, I'd almost expect somewhere to have tried something similar, but it's not a common thing here.
 * It's possible this would be clear with more definition of ĝardeno, but this looks like a calique of public garden, which is opaque to me as an American and seems to be not entirely SOP with respect to British English.
 * Delete. The distinctions here seem speculative. Fay Freak (talk) 23:19, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note sense 1.1 of : “ [An outdoor area containing one or more types of plants grown for ornamental purposes] to which the public have access.” (The plural form “have” reveals this was written by a Briton.) I don’t see which elements in the above are considered speculative, considering that everything is sourced. While it is obvious that a is public, it is less obvious that in this collocation  is not a  open to public use, but a park intended for recreational use by the public.  --Lambiam 15:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Delete because SOP, the discussion above about British vs. US translations is irrelevant. In Esperanto, ĝardeno is a garden, by default one where you might walk but not plant your own flowers or vegetables unless maybe you were the owner. Publika makes it "public", i.e., anyone may walk there but not on the flowerbeds if there are any and still (the way I understand it) not plant one's own vegetables if one is neither the garden's owner nor its gardener. This particular Esperanto noun phrase means nothing else than the sum of its parts. If there are swings or maybe dogs' toilets in that particular garden, they may be used according to how they are meant to be used; but the phrase publika ĝardeno doesn't say whether there will or won't be the one or the other. — Tonymec (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

RFD-deleted. --Fytcha (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)