Talk:puissantness

RFV discussion: April 2023–January 2024
probably just used once by Ascham It is probably (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * It also appears here as a gloss for, itself a rare word according to Treccani. I'm not much of a fan of using glosses as evidence for RFV though. This, that and the other (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Also this: the all-Puissantness of the Pope. Another cite of questionable application... This, that and the other (talk) 10:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I've found two 21st-century works using the word:, . Einstein2 (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It is meant as a nonce-word error in the first one though. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)


 * RFV-passed Demonicallt (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)