Talk:pyow

Deletion debate
rfd-sense: interjection: the call of a monkey. Move to wikiMonkey; keep citations (which look like they support the noun); keep noun. DCDuring TALK 18:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't this require citations of a monkey actually saying the word 'pyow'. The current citations just refer to the noun a 'pyow'. I'd love to rfv this. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe we should keep it for a while and put in a . DCDuring TALK 22:46, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Discussion now at WT:TR. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * They wouldn't have to be citations of a monkey. We certainly wouldn't cite the interjection moo from a book written by a cow. Equinox ◑ 16:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I think "moo" would make it under the widespread-use exception. DCDuring TALK 17:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually all animal-sound "replications" seem to differ according to the native language of the speaker, as much as that of the animal. DCDuring TALK 17:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Moving to WT:RFV. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV discussion
Rfv-sense. Interjection. Passed rfd (Talk:pyow) but only because it's been moved to rfv instead. Initial question, do the two citations support an interjection, or a noun? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I created this entry and now agree that an interjection would be "monkey language", not English. I'm going to move the whole lot to a noun sense. Equinox ◑ 12:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * if you're removing animal sounds from Interjection sections, you have a bit of work on your hands. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 15:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think this is in the same category as moo: or baa:. I think I tried to explain that in a previous discussion about pyow:, but haven't got time to find it at the moment! Equinox ◑ 11:48, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Closing: interjection moved to noun. Equinox ◑ 16:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)