Talk:quedship

RFV discussion: November 2015–January 2016
, I can find no evidence of this word's existence. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * That was taken from A new English dictionary on historical principles : founded mainly on the materials collected by the Philological Society, which no longer has it up online, as I see...The word was a derivative under the headword of 'Qued', 'Quede' listing as Quedly adv. [ = OFris. qua(de]liki ] wickedly ; Quedness, Quedship, evil, wickedness. Leasnam (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It is still here [] Leasnam (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * That's not really useful evidence; do you have anything relevant to RFV? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * No. This is where I got the info when I created the entry. A review today will no doubt result in a deletion of the entry, which I do not contest, as it fails RFV Leasnam (talk) 19:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)