Talk:quieuit

quieuit
WT:ALA says to use 'v' for the consonant form (representing ) and 'u' for the vowel for (representing ). Therefore we should delete this. However this may contradict WT:CFI as this spelling may be attested. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn’t contradict the CFI, thanks to the WT:CFI section. — Ungoliant (Falai) 15:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The varieties of Latin that would have this spelling consider u and v as the same letter, so this is more analogous the choice between different apostrophe and hyphen characters. Although it would make it easier to search for that variant, it would open the door to a v-only form and a u-only form for all Latin entries containing v or u, and the current mixed-u/v-form would make three forms for all of those entries. Multiply that by the number of inflected forms, and we're talking lots of redundant entries (and then there would be the same for i/j). Chuck Entz (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Assuming soft redirects to a canonical spelling specified at ALA, I don't see the problem with that, at all. But per our current policy, yeah, delete. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 07:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)