Talk:róla

Hungarian
-- the etym currently describes this as coming from "otherwise unattested adverb ". However, isn't this the same element as the delative case suffix ? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 16:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * : I updated the etymology in and . I think both came from the ancient adverb ról. As I mentioned before, some of the Zaicz entries are very hard to understand and translate. --Panda10 (talk) 17:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * : Thank you! The etym at  now seems to say it's from .  Is that correct?  Or am I misunderstanding?  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 18:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * : You mean the etym at, right? It doesn't say it is from -tól/-től but it is confusing because Zaicz says the Proto-Hungarian adverb ról with the meaning of -tól/-től which is a suffix. I can remove it to avoid confusion. There are times when I don't add etymology simply because the Hungarian description is too convoluted and I can't figure it out. --Panda10 (talk) 20:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry for my confusion, I meant . Thank you for the explanation and the edits.
 * Should this entry link through to  as well?  That entry includes an inflection table, which lists .  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I linked them to each other and I moved the declension to the correct entry. --Panda10 (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)