Talk:röck döts

röck döts
Just seems a bit protologistic, and I can't see any obviously good cites for it. Ƿidsiþ 09:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Quite a few cites on Usenet, including some that are clear uses, not mentions. The expression seems to date back to at least 2004, so although it's a recent coining, it doesn't seem to be a protologism as far as Wiktionary is concerned. Smurrayinchester (talk) 10:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I don't think I've ever seen a User:Equinox term fail RFV. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Added five new cites (plus the one featured on the main entry) to the citations page. Astral (talk) 10:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Looks good to me. I've swapped the cite on the main page for a couple of the more respectable ones found by Astral. Ƿidsiþ 10:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)