Talk:recognized component

Requests for deletion - kept
Kept. See archived discussion of December 2008. 07:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

RFD discussion
This was added by a bot from an article somewhere (not Wikipedia). Is it any more than a sum of parts?  D b f  i  r  s  


 * It was probably created from the singular. That singular was deleted by SB, leaving this orphan. Would you like to put the singular form through RfD on these grounds? It lookls like it is some vocabulary used in the UL process for electrical devices. DCDuring TALK 20:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Searching on '"recognized component" UL' gets 75 raw b.g.c. hits. It certainly isn't SoP because it relates to a specific important approval process which is probably essential to allowing goods to become salable in the US. I don't much care about the plural, but the singular should be a keep, or rather a restore and rfc. DCDuring TALK 20:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I suppose the "recognized by the US Government" sense might be worth recording (just) - but isn't this officially Recognized Component Mark?  D b f  i  r  s   22:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * UL is a not-for-profit funded by the insurance industry. It seems to be used commonly more or less as entered. There mere fact that there is an official definition doesn't necessarily mean that much, unless actually usage "wants" to conform to that definition. People don't spend a lot of time making sure that trade-mark and service-mark appear every place the mark holder would like them to, nor are we obligated to uphold their trademark. In any event, I will restore the singular and edit it into shape for our consideration. DCDuring TALK 23:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keeping and striking: no strong feeling for deletion, especially now that the singular exists unchallenged. Equinox ◑ 21:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)