Talk:refundant

RFV discussion
Appears to be either a scanno or a misspelling. OTOH, given the listed sense, a slight alteration of redundant might be indicative of it being a protologism. Only the fact that the editor who added this also added a good word, acronymize, caused me to not speedy delete it. — Carolina wren discussió 03:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * RFV failed, entry deleted. Even well-meaning editors make mistakes. —Ruakh TALK 01:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)