Talk:render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's

RFD discussion: February–July 2018
Tagged but not listed. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Abstain. I don't know how it's used in English, so I'm not casting any vote yet. Is better? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think is better. I doubt that the line is often quoted in full. — SGconlaw (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It could be an alternative form of . ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The has unto.  --Lambiam 13:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, I prefer the full version, it makes more sense. It's certainly not gibberish as suggested in the RFD notice (what cheek!). DonnanZ (talk) 23:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * An inexperienced puppetmaster trying to play innocent... —suzukaze (t・c) 02:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * If it's attested, keep it. Whichever form isn't lemmatized can soft- (or hard-) redirect to whichever form is lemmatized. - -sche (discuss) 17:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It's attested in millions of bibles, I would have thought. And it doesn't stop there... DonnanZ (talk) 00:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

As a translation of a Greek phrase (Ἀπόδοτε οὖν τὰ Καίσαρος Καίσαρι) there are a range of variations in how it is written in English. Here's a Google Ngram of some (constrained by the five word limit in search terms) to consider as alternative formations. The term is the most common. -Stelio (talk) 09:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 03:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)