Talk:representamen

RFC discussion: October 2012–February 2021
An encyclopedia article, IMO. DCDuring TALK 02:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * An encyclopedia article would be more concise. This is an article, the notes section and the bibliography from the back of the book, all dumped on the same page. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I have moved the Latin material to [[repraesentamen]], which leaves the excessively long definition, which is solely based on the usage by . We could use other citations, which seem abundant enough in the literature of semiotics to warrant Collins having a definition. I personally don't speak or read semiotics. DCDuring TALK 13:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Closed as stale. &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 22:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)