Talk:right man

Why is this page marked for deletion?
 * Hello. I can't give you an answer (not idiomatic? not enough quotations?), but the quotation is much too long, you have to cut it. Also, please don't forget to sign your messages with ~ . --Barytonesis (talk) 11:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * And see its entry at Wiktionary:Requests for deletion. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I created an entry for Right Man, which solves the title case, plural name, & a shortened quotation. Btakita (talk) 11:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

RFD discussion: November 2017–May 2018
If it exists at all - bad caps, bad plural. SemperBlotto (talk) 10:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

keep. It does exist (see supporting cites), and with this capitalization. Kiwima (talk) 04:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * "If it exists at all" sounds like a matter for WT:RFVE. "bad plural" sounds like a matter for WT:RFC (bad plural created by template ). "bad caps" sounds like a matter for WT:RFVE or WT:RFC. I can't see any RFD relevant argument (like SOP, or maybe non-standard SMS/chat/internet mis-capitalisation which could be a reason to delete non-capitalised English proper nouns). 84.161.6.246 04:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep if attested wth an idiomatic meaning, which it apparently is, although I can't make sense of it. - -sche (discuss) 23:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)