Talk:rohingyalish

RFV discussion
Nowt in Books and Usenet. Equinox ◑ 12:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * But seems to be real - see as an example. SemperBlotto 16:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia says yes, too. Perhaps it's just rare, hence hard to attest. But not because it doesn't exist. Mglovesfun (talk) 06:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * If we do keep this, entry name might need capitalising. Equinox ◑ 15:56, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. I wish the Rohingya well in their efforts to promote literacy in their own language; but this name does not seem to meet the CFI as an English word. —Ruakh TALK 22:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)