Talk:route redistribution

RFD discussion: January–December 2020
This entry is for a 2-word phrase, not a single word. 66.82.144.143 23:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


 * That's not in itself a reason to delete: some two-word phrases, like black magic, are includable. The important question is whether the meaning is obvious by putting the two words together, as in black car. Equinox ◑ 00:15, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what makes some people tick - it has been RFD'd by the creator. DonnanZ (talk) 00:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * It was a test edit that is no longer needed. I was trying to create some other entry but the edit filter blocked me and I wasn't sure why.  That being said, it is a legitimate technical term, and also "author requested deletion" seems not to be a speedy-deletion criterion on Wiktionary like it is on Wikipedia, so if somebody else thinks that it should stay, that's okay with me. 66.82.144.143 01:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. It appears unlikely to me that someone would guess the meaning of the term solely from the components. For one thing, what is being redistributed are not routes themselves, but information used for routing. Then, this information is not redistributed between network nodes (routers) as in some network protocols, such as, but between different routing protocols running on a single node. --Lambiam 08:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - Dentonius (my politics | talk) 13:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

RFD kept &mdash; Dentonius 08:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)