Talk:running text

Ugh. Apologies all around. I read that too quickly; yes the definitions are distinct enough from each other. I will remove the RNDC. --Connel MacKenzie 21:00, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * +1. Is there any need to mention infoplease here?  It's not an attestation in running text as per CFI.  (If "running text" is not the right term to use in CFI, we should fix that.  The real criterion there is whether the word is used to convey meaning.)  The definition itself is not a copyvio, but including the link makes it look like one. -dmh 17:17, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)