Talk:safe, sane and consensual

Oxford comma

 * This page should be moved to a new title with an Oxford comma (a three-word list should have two commas). However, I think these terms are self-explanatory enough to be safely deleted as a sum of parts for a Wiktionary entry.  Nicole Sharp (talk) 09:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Why should we enforce an Oxford comma?? Ƿidsiþ 09:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * My own personal pet peeve. Any list without one drives me nuts.  However, Oxford commas are extremely practical in reducing grammatical conflation, e.g. even here it can imply that "sane and consensual" could be on a different level of importance and even within a separate list as "safe."  However, I am more concerned about the entry being a self-explanatory sum of parts, so it can probably be safely deleted.  Even in translation, each term would be translated separately, with no need to maintain translations of all three terms together (since they do not imply any different meaning than the terms separately).  Nicole Sharp (talk) 09:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * But yes, if this is acceptable as a non-SOP entry, then we should probably include both spellings with and without an Oxford comma. Nicole Sharp (talk) 09:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

RFD discussion: April–August 2017
Tagged in March (as SoP), not listed. See Talk:safe, sane and consensual. Equinox ◑ 22:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. There isn't much of a "definition" to it. Equinox ◑ 22:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Apparently crazy people like me are incapable of having good sex. — (((Romanophile))) ♞ (contributions) 09:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as SoP. — SMUconlaw (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If it is an established set phrase used in the stated context, I think it should probably be kept. The fact that it has an acronym, SSC, at least according to the Wiktionary article, might support this. Mihia (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. — Ungoliant (falai) 16:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Having the term in this dictionary is unsafe, insane, and unconsensual. PseudoSkull (talk) 04:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is in a topical area for which we often seem to ignore the standards that apply elsewhere. Is that relevant? DCDuring (talk) 02:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I see consensus for the entry to be deleted. — SGconlaw (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)