Talk:saxacious

RFV discussion: August 2014–January 2015
— Ungoliant (falai) 17:18, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Not in the OED and no hits at OneLook. Also no usage at gutenberg.org. And not even any usages vaguely consistent with this definition on the unfiltered web. It doesn't look good for this one. -- · (talk) 22:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. The word can't be found in any dictionary in which I looked; a brief Internet search evinces three pages of results, and no attestation at all. Princeps linguae (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Let me point out that, as per our WT:CFI (esp. WT:CFI and WT:CFI), we do not go by dictionaries but rather by actual use. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Does anyone have actual attesting quotations as per WT:ATTEST? --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed. The only citation I could find seemed to be an error for sagacious. - -sche (discuss) 04:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)