Talk:schrongen

RFV discussion: November 2022–October 2023
Dutch, tagged by Surj. This looks supremely suspect, nothing in any of the dictionaries at either the GTB or the eWND. The speculative suggested Gaulish etymon is another red flag and so is the anomalous phonotactics. Google Books offers nothing but scannos. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Pinging for feedback. ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Never heard of it. Google Books does give a German verb apparently, but that has nothing to do with Dutch. Thadh (talk) 14:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * All German hits that I've seen are scannos of what is correctly . OCR is bad at Fraktur. Searching for finite verb forms of *schrongen gives nothing but more scannos. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 14:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Nothing shows up in the usual literature, the closest is a hit for the singular noun "schrong" (appears only once in 1732, seems to mean "excision") in the WNT 030NogBeterHe (talk) 14:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 13:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)