Talk:second bases

third bases
These seem to be either singularia tantum or possibly English nouns with unattested plurals. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Huh? The plurals for all three are easily attested on a quick b.g.c. search. --EncycloPetey 20:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, not really: yields, relevant among its first 100 hits, only the three I've now added to [[citations:third bases]] (and one more which Google won't let me see);  yields among its first 110 only the three I've added to [[citations:first bases]]; and the first 250(!) hits at  yield only the three I've added to [[citations:second bases]]. But I think they're all cited. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 16:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV passed. Thanks for the cites, msh210! —Ruakh TALK 01:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)