Talk:see you in hell

RFD discussion
Not sure if this is the correct way to do this: I'm not challenging the validity of the entry- it certainly seems idiomatic, and can be encountered all over the place in popular culture. I am, however, nominating this to for removal from the phrasebook. WF no doubt included the phrasebook template as a joke- I can't imagine anyone actually needing to know this in real life. Chuck Entz (talk) 09:39, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I think we should not use the phrasebook template on entries which meet regular CFI, even if we decide to manually put them into the phrasebook category. - -sche (discuss) 04:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Just remove it, I too think it might be a joke. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet any expressed standard of "usefulness, simplicity and commonness", nor my own ineffable inuition of what such a standard might be. Tt doesn't warrant inclusion in the phrasebook, IMO. DCDuring TALK 12:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I seem to remember this being nominated before. Delete. --WikiTiki89 12:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete this, but I think we need "I'll see you in hell first", which has a differnt meaning and gets plenty of mileage.--Dmol (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Never heard that one, what does it mean? --WikiTiki89 13:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It's a vehement refusal, and seems to date back to the mid to late 1800s.--Dmol (talk) 14:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I've removed the phrasebook tag. (The entry remains.) - -sche (discuss) 19:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)