Talk:self-uned

RFV discussion: May–July 2014
This word is used in a work by Joshua Sylvester; see. I guess the inclusion of this word hinges on whether Sylvester's translation of Du Bartas is considered a "well-known work". This, that and the other (talk) 11:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I have added the Sylvester cite. Note his use of the accent as in self-unéd. If that counts, there are now two cites on the page. Spinning Spark  11:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * And there'll be a third when someone adds the Du Bartas one. This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sylvester is translating Du Bartas, the original won't be English. Spinning Spark  18:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * But can't translations be cited? It doesn't make sense to disallow them, if that's what you're saying. This, that and the other (talk) 12:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Translations (that is, the English editions of works) can be cited. I imagine Spinningspark thought you expected Du Bartas in the original French to count as a citation — that is also what I thought your comment was suggesting, and I'm not sure what you meant if not that. A work by Sylvester has already been cited, if you cite another, it won't count towards attesting the word, per WT:CFI. - -sche (discuss) 17:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, no, I wasn't suggesting to cite a non-English word in an English entry; I'm not sure how that could be inferred. Anyway, I wasn't really aware of the idea of per-author independence, so we are still in need of one more citation here, I suppose. This, that and the other (talk) 07:50, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. Citations moved to Citations:self-uned. Added to Appendix:English dictionary-only terms. — Ungoliant (falai) 00:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)