Talk:sextuple

RFV discussion: March 2017
"Having anal sex six times" and "To have, or make someone, have orgasm six times" — this is obviously false right? I admit, I'm not well versed in teenage slang, but this just feels wrong. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I know a fair bit about teenage slang and I fully agree, that does seem to be nonsense. My Google-fu is yielding nothing, and it's not even in Urban Dictionary. Probably should just be removed, was added by an anon too. — Kleio (t · c) 18:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kleio! I trust your judgement so I'll go ahead and remove it. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Failed. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * But it's not "RFV failed" as this wasn't an ordinary RFV procedure. By the intro one would have to wait almost one month, until one could delete it and state "RFV failed", cp. "more than a month without being "cited"" etc. This "Failed" was more like "possible vandalism removed". -84.161.9.84 21:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * This definition is absolutely ridiculous. ― PapíDimmi  ( talk | contribs )  22:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Unstriking: close too soon per the top of the page, including 'After a discussion has sat for more than a month without being "cited" ...'. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I mean, it has been just added in March and could be speedied. But other than that, regular RFV process does not allow closing RFV so early; it cannot be closed as "RFV failed". --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Etymology
[Early 17th century. < medieval Latin sextuplus < Latin sex "six"] JMGN (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)