Talk:sferics

Might have valid print citations, but not many. Enough? --Connel MacKenzie 18:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Over 91,000 google hits, including some respectable technical sites. One example: http://www.spaceweather.com/glossary/inspire.html . Keep. —Stephen 08:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Added cites at the article. I'm a little unclear as to whether the senses should be further broken to seperate the normal plural of sferic and the pluralia tantum construction; both are evident in the quotes available from Google Books.  I've left a usage note indicating that both are found, but if anyone with a better feel for that could step in, that might help. --Jeffqyzt 19:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

RFV passed, although breakdown of senses is unresolved, and as it pertains to RFV the distinction of plural form of sferic from other meanings. DAVilla 16:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)