Talk:sigma

I often hear the construction "within one sigma" of something. I don't find that explained here. Anyone more clueful, care to update? (User:68.41.146.119, 20 September 2005)


 * I took a shot at adding the statistics meaning. (Please sign your entries, even when anon IP.)  --Connel MacKenzie [ + ] (contribs) 15:16, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

revert
Hi Stephen, I see that you re‑verted my ad‑d in talk: sigma page, why ? It's a very use‑full in‑formation... email sent by User:Nemzag, 15:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I reverted the discussion page. Your comment appeared to be identical to the comment that you added to numerous other pages. You only need to comment once, and in an appropriate place. The appropriate place is WT:AGRC. I do not understand what you mean about it being full of use in formations. What formations? In your recent absence, your ability to write good English has suffered greatly. I cannot understand what you write anymore. —Stephen (Talk) 18:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC)