Talk:silmähaudekuppi

RFV discussion: December 2015–January 2016
, if it's not used, we shouldn't be creating an entry for it. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Dunno, maybe we should have a category for dictionary-only terms, just in case somebody would want to check. This term happens to be quite wide-spread in the dictinary world, even Princeton has it. I thought we could/should do something to prevent someone from creating the entry by citing Princeton as evidence! --Hekaheka (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * We sometimes link to Appendix:Dictionary-only terms for these in English. Equinox ◑ 23:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I see no reason not to create Appendix:Finnish dictionary-only terms even if it only has one entry. There's always a chance to add more. Renard Migrant (talk) 20:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV failed and converted as suggested above. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

RFD discussion: January 2023
Finnish. A ghost word that only exists in WordNet, known for its ghost words. &mdash; S URJECTION / T / C / L / 17:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any point in hosting an empty entry. Thadh (talk) 13:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted &mdash; S URJECTION / T / C / L / 11:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)