Talk:siraxta

Citable?
, is this word actually citable, or is it Neo-Gaulish (in which case we should delete it)? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I don't really have any Gaulish materials. It isn't in Matasovic's dictionary, but that dictionary doesn't usually list derived forms anyway, just the most basic roots (and the Gaulish name Siros from is listed). It also isn't listed in GPC's entry for, but that doesn't prove anything. I guess we should take it to RFV since Bli med doesn't seem to be around anymore. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 17:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

RFV discussion: May–July 2016
RFV per Talk:siraxta, where I express doubt that this word isn't merely Neo-Gaulish, and Angr cites sources which lack it. If it fails, the link at should be removed as well. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 18:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Full disclosure: the sources I mentioned are not ones that I would necessarily expect to cite this form if it exists, so the argument from their silence is very weak. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Failed. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)