Talk:sliddjur

RFV discussion: October 2016–January 2017
Added by editor who seems to delight in obscenities, vandalism and alt-right politics. — Kleio (t · c) 17:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Is that cause for deletion? Rasptr (talk) 17:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * No, but infantile behaviour and vandalism renders any created entry dubious. I couldn't find any citations for sliddjur that meet our criteria, so I posted it in RFV. Can you verify it with three durably archived attestations? — Kleio (t · c) 18:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * This user seems to have something against me, but I will try to oblige him anyway. Rasptr (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It should also be noted that KIeio has a predilection for obscenities of a sexually perverted nature, and an infantile interest in faeces. Such immoral behaviour makes anything he says dubious. Rasptr (talk) 18:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Rasptr is right in as much as RFV isn't for nominating entries of people you don't like. Please use user talk for insulting each other and use the space here for discussing the entry. Now, I don't know whether these three citations are CFI-meeting so I'll leave it to someone else to work that out. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * When I see people make obviously bad-faith vandal edits like the one I linked in my original post here (the revisions have since been deleted) I tend to not assume good faith on entries for apparently very obscure obscenities they create immediately afterward - that has nothing to do with personal vendetta. As a matter of fact, I had never noticed this editor before yesterday. Anyway, the word does seem to exist, though I think the latter two citations are mere mentions and not actual examples of usage, however I am never 100% on that either, so maybe someone more neutral ought to decide? (For the record, I don't at all object to entries for vulgarities/slang, but I do object to vandalism.) — Kleio (t · c) 14:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * (As far as I'm concerned this passed by the way, since it's just sitting here. I suppose it can be archived.) — Kleio (t · c) 20:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)