Talk:smackful

RFV discussion: January–March 2019
Usenet results seem to just be word lists of some kind, while the scarce book results seem to have a different meaning. &mdash; surjection &lang;?&rang; 13:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks like "Anglish" linguistic revisionism- flavor is from Old French and replaced smack. Chuck Entz (talk) 13:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * You know when you've been hanging around here 10 years and you can just tell who created an entry by the way it's written? I would have laid a tenner on the noun, "as mush as a fishing smack can hold", being a subsequent joke addition by Wonderfool, but apparently not. Anyway, remember the noun is being challenged here as well as the Anglish adjective. Equinox ◑ 00:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Speaking of which: this looks like our Indian archaicist who kept trying to put Elizabethan usexes in entries. Note that I don't use checkuser tools for something like this, so it's just a hunch. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * After making the RFV, I reviewed the edits and got the same idea - I went through all of them and tried to get rid of some of the more pointless edits. &mdash; surjection &lang;?&rang; 11:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The online OED has the noun sense. SemperBlotto (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I can't even verify the etymology. There is no Middle English smakkeful or smechful to speak of Leasnam (talk) 03:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 22:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC)