Talk:smurfberry

RFV discussion: November 2014–June 2015
Only in the Smurfs universe? Needs to meet WT:FICTION. Equinox ◑ 17:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I have added some External links to meet the criteria of attestation. The smurfberry seen as a berry is, without any doubt, part of a fictional universe. The game curreny, however, isn't fiction at all. It was hard reality and quite a shock for a number of parents a couple of years ago.--93.193.8.229 19:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The links only provide support for the game currency. The fictional sense needs cites that do not explicitly refer to the fictional universe: that's what we mean when we say it has "entered the language".  See, for example, kryptonite. Choor monster (talk) 01:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The usual interpretation is that the citations need to be on the page or the citations page, and they aren't. Renard Migrant (talk) 23:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * For 93.193.8.229 'fictional universe' refers to the content not the medium! A book made of paper, the paper isn't fictional but the information contained in the page may well be! Renard Migrant (talk) 16:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * To clarify. Citations don't actually have to be anywhere, unless challenged.  There are only 2 kryptonite cites, for example, but since everybody knows it has entered the language, nobody is challenging it for the third to make it official.  Referring to links is common during discussion, helping others judge the challenged term.  At the moment, smurfberry the currency seems secure, but the fictional berry remains unsupported. Choor monster (talk) 16:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Failed RFV. Equinox ◑ 16:31, 20 June 2015 (UTC)