Talk:software testing

RFD discussion: February 2018

 * Note: this was tagged with RFD with the comment "SoP" by on 21 December 2017 but it looks like no discussion was created until now. — SGconlaw (talk) 08:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I think that the notion of software testing is an important subject on which a lot of books have been published; an article also exists in the. Therefore, I am against a deletion.--Sae1962 (talk) 07:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: I'm afraid the fact that a subject is important does not make a term non-SoP if it is sum-of-parts. The current definition shows that the term is merely + . — SGconlaw (talk) 08:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, Delete. I can't think that it could be anything other than the testing of software. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 09:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: per SemperBlotto - John Cross (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just because of importance or relevance does not make it non-SOP or lexical. For instance, note how we don't have mathematical research, and things like that. PseudoSkull (talk) 00:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The "stakeholders" etc. in the definition is trying to make it not SoP, but is just wrong (you can test your own software without any stakeholders being involved). Equinox ◑ 12:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Lordy, Delete. "Software" is just one of a zillion terms that could have "testing" tacked on. -- · (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 12:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 17:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)