Talk:specific address

RFD
Useless blank entry. All Google Books hits are SOP as far as I can tell. There's zh:specific address, but both defintions appear to be SOP Chinese. Smurrayinchester (talk) 08:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * IMO any rfdef entry that has no content (no citations, no pronunciation, etc.) should just be speedied: "no usable content given". We have the request pages for this. Equinox ◑ 14:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Deleted Doesn't mean anything. SemperBlotto (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)