Talk:speedrunneth

RFV discussion
Even if we include lexemes as a whole, -eth forms are no longer part of the English conjugation paradigm, so I think they should only be included if they are attested. Furthermore, if this word is attested (which I doubt, since even a regular Google search yields zero results), it should probably be marked as pseudoarchaic. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable, though I'm not sure about "pseudo-". I assume that the citations would speak for themselves. DCDuring TALK 01:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * They would... if there were any. I couldn't find a single one on Google Books either, nor any on Google Groups. Not a joke, not a scanno, nothing. --Catsidhe (verba, facta) 01:39, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I think we can safely assume that this article should be speedy deleted, as an obvious fail! Rædi Stædi Yæti  {- skriv til mig -} 06:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedied per entry creator’s suggestion. — Ungoliant (falai) 06:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)