Talk:spelling nazi

"(please add an English translation of this usage example)"

I'm not fixing these issues right now because you may want to reconsider if this article is worth keeping at all. W3ird N3rd (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Page created by unregistered user.
 * Crappy source. (spam?)
 * Crappy description has spelling errors and is close to gibberish to me.
 * Ironically incorrectly spelled (compound words have no space in Dutch, spellingnazi or spellingsnazi are more acceptable forms)
 * is a far more common synonym.
 * "de nazi uithangen" (acting like a nazi) is not a thing. You can equally go and "de dronkenlap uithangen" (acting like a drunk) or "de clown uithangen" (acting like a clown).

RFD discussion: July–September 2017
To put it in a more PC way: I think it's a pile of shit. W3ird N3rd (talk) 05:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Page created by unregistered user.
 * Crappy source for usage. (spam?)
 * Crappy description has spelling errors and is practically gibberish to me as a native speaker.
 * Ironically incorrectly spelled (compound words have no space in Dutch, spellingnazi or spellingsnazi are more acceptable forms)
 * is a far more common synonym.
 * "de nazi uithangen" (acting like a nazi) is not a thing. You can equally go "de dronkenlap uithangen" (acting like a drunk) or "de clown uithangen" (acting like a clown).


 * (1.; 5.) not a reason for deletion.
 * (3.) description or definition seems to be ok. The example maybe isn't.
 * (4.) is that also true for borrowings and is that universal, does it apply to all borrowings? In German compounds are spelled as one word, but some borrowings from English are split anyway or can be split like or . Category:Dutch terms borrowed from English has the split Dutch term.
 * (6.) Do you mean that "de nazi uithangen" does not exist or that it is SOP (sum of parts)? If it is SOP, it could be linked like.
 * Is this a matter of WT:RFV (verification, or attestation) or WT:RFC (clean-up) instead of WT:RFD (deletion)?
 * -84.161.34.75 15:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. —CodeCat 15:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * My apologies, you are right, I meant the example. The example is crap. 1. and 5. are indeed no reason for deletion, but 1. can indicate a careless edit and 5. is saying it's odd to have some obscure version of a word while not having the commonly accepted variant. As for 4., it is a rule. Exceptions exist but are rare. Golden retriever would be one. Big Mac might be, we won't say "bigmac" but this is a product name, not a regular word. (the word will vanish if McDonalds goes out of business) Cottage cheese is also written with seperate words, but may also be called hüttenkäse. Lapis lazuli comes from Latin, not English and is also known as lazuursteen. Both are officially words. (http://woordenlijst.org/ government-approved source) Hot dog would be wrong. I have never heard of a "Anti-roll bar" in Dutch, but it should be spelled antirollbar. Anti-rollbar is allowed (https://onzetaal.nl/taaladvies/antiaanbaklaag-anti-aanbaklaag) but not the default. In fact, I suspect this would become antirolbar. (English: I roll / Dutch: ik rol) I have performed a few searches on a Dutch car forum and found:
 * anti rolbar
 * anti-roll bar
 * antiroll bar
 * antirollbar
 * antirolbar
 * Found only one instance of each. I found two instances of "antirolbar" but that was the same user.
 * 6. may be SoP but it's also SoP in Dutch. Dutch wiktionary won't allow entries for "brown leaf"/"bruin blad", "large box"/"grote doos" or "acting like a nazi"/"de nazi uithangen".
 * In order to keep this entry you will need to create spellingnazi/spellingsnazi but if anyone wants to invest their time into that they should create taalnazi instead. With taalnazi created spelling(s)nazi will be a synonym for that. Once all that is done a RfV will be required to verify "spelling nazi" is a common misspelling of spellingnazi and redirect to that. Considering all the contents from this article are useless and it would require a complete rewrite from scratch, I see no point in keeping it. It's like asking a toddler to paint your house. Yes, there will be paint, but it will not help. W3ird N3rd (talk) 07:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, SOP to sense 3 of Nazi. bd2412 T 02:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as SoP. — SGconlaw (talk) 02:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Well why the hell are we RFDing the Dutch term? The English term is essentially the same thing... PseudoSkull (talk) 03:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * A Dutch entry. The WT:CFI-relevant rationale for deletion would be that this is sum of parts; the Dutch entry nazi would need to be used (3rd sense is "an authoritarian, strict or nitpicky person"), as well as the Dutch entry for spelling. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- · (talk) 03:25, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — SGconlaw (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)