Talk:splatterdash

RFV discussion: December 2021
Rfv-sense: uproar Notusbutthem (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * This term has an odd assortment of senses that turn up in isolated uses. I can find two cites where it appears to mean "poetry with sloppy expression":
 * (the full text of the quote is here)
 * This one is this closest we get to "uproar":
 * There are also a couple of cites talking about a splatterdash approach to teaching, involving "This is to avoid what may be termed “splatterdash” teaching—the teaching of everything with special reference to no one particular thing, the teaching of what is understood and not understood.", also.
 * Here it is being used as an adverb:.
 * Generally the sense is one of a disorderly, haphazard approach. I'm not sure whether we can - or should - distil it more finely. This, that and the other (talk) 04:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I fixed sense 2 in the entry. The situation remains that the RFV'd sense only has one cite (Baringer above). This, that and the other (talk) 11:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Generally the sense is one of a disorderly, haphazard approach. I'm not sure whether we can - or should - distil it more finely. This, that and the other (talk) 04:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I fixed sense 2 in the entry. The situation remains that the RFV'd sense only has one cite (Baringer above). This, that and the other (talk) 11:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

cited Kiwima (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 20:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)