Talk:square yoctometer

RFV discussion: July–August 2019
DTLHS (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I suspect this was added as a joke. We don’t even have the easily attestable . As far as I am concerned, all these square  entries are SOP; same for cubic. Some may be defensible as being phrasebookish.


 * *sigh* I have added a cite to the citations page. It seems to me, however, that your objection is more that it is SOP, which is an issue for Requests for Deletion, not requests for verification. I understand that it is sometimes easier to get rid of a word through RFV, but it just creates busywork for those of us who hunt down citations. Kiwima (talk) 22:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * lol. I think that any "square ___" should be an RFD issue for hopefully obvious reasons. If you don't get it then kill yourself. JUST KIDDING MAYBE. Equinox ◑ 03:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 22:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)