Talk:squish

RFV
Rfv-sense: An aromantic or platonic attraction (by analogy with crush).

I've encountered this sense before "in the wild," so it's not something made up by the editor who added it to the entry, but I'm having trouble finding uses in CFI-compliant cites. -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 03:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I've heard it before too, though not very often. I managed to find one quotation, which I've added to the one that was already in the entry. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 04:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 00:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Funny, I was just about to mention something about this. Perhaps we should put this out for reconsideration? - TheMartianGeek


 * It can always be recreated, but not until three citations are found that meet WT:CFI. Equinox ◑ 21:36, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * We currently have two citations—if you can find a third one, we can add the sense back to the entry. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)