Talk:stare con i piedi per terra

RFD discussion: June 2021–August 2023
Italian SOP. Should at the very least be moved to. Note also that there are and  with the same meaning. Whether we should add these as alt forms, create a new sense at, or something else is up to debate. But I think it's clear this term should be removed as SOP. Imetsia (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm honestly not sure where this definition belongs. Ultimateria (talk) 22:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Deleting this, and creating an entry for makes the most sense to me. — GianWiki (talk) 10:10, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * What about, with as an alternative form (or the reverse)? In any case, I think we should have an entry, and not only a sense at . Compare 🇨🇬 / . 212.224.230.114 16:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That sounds like probably the best solution. Imetsia (talk) 20:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * There seems to be a general pattern with idioms that typically combine with a very limited number of synonymous verbs in what is essentially an verb + adverb structure. It seems quite arbitrary to break up that structure given that it constitutes an idiom - we probably wouldn't want to break up any other verb+adverb. In this case however a Google search shows that it's most often used as, or con i, and combines with a very wide selection of verbs, theres even a book title with ; other verbs like takes it without the conjunction, however. Frankly I think it would be easier if we didn't delete the extended idioms as SOPs (as Imetsia has been doing), because an idiom that contains an idiom still remains an idiom and doesn't become a SOP. Making them alt forms seems the optimal solution to me. Brutal Russian (talk) 23:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The best solution, similar to what was suggested above, might be to make an entry at with alt form, and then leave this entry as a redirect. I'm trying to do this in a way consistent both with our practices and with what other authoritative dictionaries have. For the record, the big dictionaries do have this entry as listed here. If there is no objection, I'll go forward with this solution. : What do you think? Imetsia (talk (more ) ) 16:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, but I think there should be a separate entry for, because of its adjectival sense of “grounded in reality; sensible” (e.g. è una ragazza coi piedi per terra (“she's a sensible girl”). What do you think? —— GianWiki (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't see why this can't be a usex or collocation at . Imetsia (talk (more ) ) 17:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess you're right. —— GianWiki (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * RFD-kept but redirected. Imetsia (talk (more ) ) 00:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)