Talk:super colossal

The noun doesn't appear to exist at all, like a few of this user's super- creations (e.g. original wrong definition of supercelestial). As far as the adjective goes: supercolossal, fine, but when we split it into two words aren't we dealing with a sort of adverbial super? (I see that our adverb entry there is wrong too: it's an adjective. Curses.) Anyway, you can say "super X" for basically any adjective "X", so I see this two-word form as non-idiomatic sum of parts. Equinox ◑ 00:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Supercolossal NEVER was a noun. It's literally two adjectives or one prefix and adjective put together into a word. Somebody must have put the wrong definition when is should be SUPERCOLOSSUS. Steel Blade 01:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, I apologise if the noun wasn't yours. I thought you'd created the article. Equinox ◑ 01:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Still RFDing on the basis that "super colossal" is the adverb super plus the adjective colossal, regardless of the separate existence of the single word supercolossal. Equinox ◑ 21:32, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete per Equinox and common sense ;-). --Duncan 22:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 00:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)