Talk:supermonogamous

RFV discussion: December 2018–February 2019
Equinox ◑ 16:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I've added 2 cites for "super-monogamous", and one for the entry title. There may be another (in Part of the Solution: Portrait of a Revolutionary), but I can't actually view the purported text. Based on the number of attested cites, it should be moved to ; however, the related term is "supermonogamy", so I'm a bit torn Leasnam (talk) 17:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The 1990 citation seems more likely to mean "very monogamous" as in not thinking about other people while with the current partner, not "never having another relationship if the current relationship ends". This seems like it is corroborated by supermonogamy saying the sense wasn't coined until 2004. Context would help determine whether the 2017 citation is using the "one partner ever" sense or a more general sense (as seems more intuitive for that hyphenation). - -sche (discuss) 05:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

These are the citations that were in the entry, which are again not all the same sense(!) or spelling: (In particular, the 1990 one can't be of the claimed sense because that sense wasn't coined until later.) RFV-failed as a result. - -sche (discuss) 17:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)