Talk:superomnipresent

RFV
Can anyone find a third citation for this term to add to the two at Citations:superomnipresent? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 19:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Not even on a general Google web search did any of the three pages of results suggest anything additional that's durable. (The one scholar hit is for "super, omnipresent".) This one's going to be difficult, requiring access to some other system. DAVilla 06:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Same editor created superomniscient and superomnipotent. All three of them seem a bit daft, the best definition I can think of would be
 * Omnipresent.
 * Mglovesfun (talk) 14:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Those two are both citeable. I think even makes some sense, because an "omniscient narrator" is a normal sort of authorial voice, a third-person narrator who just naturally knows everything in the world (s)he's writing about, so a stronger term is needed if you're talking about a narrator who's noticeably omniscient, if you see what I mean. —Ruakh TALK 14:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 02:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)