Talk:suppress

RFV discussion
Vaaaaaague definition. Can someone reword it in much clearer language? I would do it but I don't quite understand the word myself! Thanks. Tooironic 08:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This should be at WT:RFC: doesn't look like a request for verification. &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 17:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've extended the definition slightly, and added a topical example. I think the US legal sense is just a particular use of the ordinary sense, but there are other shades of meaning that we should possibly show separately.    D b f  i  r  s   17:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Striking: clearly widespread use, and Tooironic doesn't seem to actually be doubting it. As msh210 says, feel free to list it at RFC. —Ruakh TALK 17:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)