Talk:surrogatum principle

Request for verification
I have made this entry and cited it, but am unsure about two of the three citations. I could not find more. It may be that the citations should be used to support surrogatum in its disputed Canadian tax sense, which got pushed in June, without yielding acceptable citations. DCDuring TALK 11:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Also see Requests_for_verification above. DCDuring TALK 11:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - check the Wikipedia article, there are plenty of citations and court cases in which surrogatum principle is used . WritersCramp 01:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. (I agree with DCDuring that the existing cites aren't quite enough. WritersCramp's comment seems to be saying that the surrogatum principle is commonly used, which is really not the same as saying that the term is commonly used.) —Ruakh TALK 16:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)