Talk:sweet on


 * Hello. Does this (and ) merit a separate entry? We already have the relevant sense at, and I think we should treat transitive/valent adjectives the same way we treat prepositionally transitive verbs, i.e. without including the preposition in the entry title. --Per utramque cavernam 13:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * That's what I did with recently (after Kiwima suggested it to me). --Per utramque cavernam 13:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I think we should delete sweet on/upon and merge it all into sweet, but can't be bothered to raise a discussion; feel free. Equinox ◑ 13:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


 * All right, I'll do that later on the BP. --Per utramque cavernam 13:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)