Talk:synæresis

RFD discussion: July 2019
I don't think we normally include typographical variants of this sort in Latin entries. Otherwise every single entry in ae could have alternatives in æ and ę. This is similar to not including separate entries for macrons and diaereses. I would speedily delete these but I'm not absolutely sure of the policy for this. Benwing2 (talk) 01:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Benwing2 (talk) 01:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Indeed, just like we do not have separate entries for ſunt and, or nomĩa and . I see no problem in redirecting from ſunt to sunt. --Lambiam 11:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Benwing2 (talk) 03:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. English entries with æ (e.g. ) are included as well, it's "all words, all languages", and spellings with æ, ę are attestable (and otherwise it's a matter for WT:RFVN).
 * As for abbreviated forms like : Such entries do exists, and can be added if attestable (WT:CFI), just like abbreviations and shortenings in other languages are included.
 * As for macrons: They aren't included as they aren't used in Latin (well, there might be exceptions like for uncommon or difficult words but that's a different thing).
 * As for the "Deleted": The entries were here for several years(!), aren't a case for speedy deletion, and deleting them in less than a week is just plain wrong.
 * --Brown*Toad (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Latin
As above. Benwing2 (talk) 01:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Benwing2 (talk) 03:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)