Talk:taklit etmemek

RFD discussion: April–July 2022
Turkish. I converted from to RFD since I don't know what is going on here. Note from nom: "this negative form is already in the conjugation table of taklit etmek." - TheDaveRoss  14:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Turkish is an agglutinative language, which means that the line between inflection and derivation is blurred: instead of separate words, Turkish uses affixes and clitics. If you created an English entry for any of huge numbers of 's Turkish single-word forms, it would be speedied on the spot as uselessly SOP. The almost infinitely expandable morphology of Turkish is the reductio ad absurdum for the Translation Hub approach.


 * has been working hard to chip away at this mountain of unnecessary minutiae, but it really requires some kind of massive industrial-scale operation. This was someone who was completely blind to SOP and utterly lacking in lexicographic common sense- but extremely prolific. Their deleted contributions are somewhere in the neighborhood of 1,800 pages, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. I can understand why someone would want to speedy this. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I put it on because the entry does not have any purposes anymore and become useless. If someone wants to see the negation, they can go directly to taklit etmek conjugation table. Lagrium (talk) 15:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. As a search term it is implausible. The conjugation table of has 346 different forms. I think there needs to be some specific reason to have an entry for a non-lemma form, such as ambiguity or also having a non-verb PoS. An example is, which has both. This one is unambiguous and completely regular.  --Lambiam 14:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. MhmtÖ (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

RFD-deleted and I'm going to flush the rest of down the toilet as well. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 17:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)