Talk:technosexual

RFV
Tagged but not currently listed; it was archived without being resolved. Previous discussion here. From the List of Oldest Tagged RFVs. Some senses already have some citations. - -sche (discuss) 07:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, times have changed since that discussion. It looks fine to me. Can we remove the tag now? --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Nah, that's what happened last time (the tag was removed without the senses having been cited). It actually needs to be cited this time around. I'll see if I can cite it. - -sche (discuss) 21:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The part of the first definition that says "defines himself" seems a little odd. Also, the second citation of the first noun definition no longer exists. --BenjaminBarrett12 (talk) 21:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've cited as many senses as I could find, and de-tagged the ones with three citations as RFV-passed, and banished the others to the citations page as RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 20:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)