Talk:tener presente

RFD discussion: April–June 2019
Italian: Having tener and tenere presente should suffice. We probably don't want hundreds of apocopic forms. --I learned some phrases (talk) 08:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * At the moment we are rather inconsistent. We have but not . Conversely, we have  but not . I think it can be argued that  =  + . (I also think that the definition “To go to sea” for  is misleading; it normally just means “to travel by boat”.) After getting rid of such sums of parts, how many apoplectic forms would we really need? Is it hundreds? [I have no firm opinion on this deletion request.]  --Lambiam 10:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that we should include apocopic forms of the base verb (where they exist) - this sort of thing is just SoP - delete. SemperBlotto (talk) 05:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * RFD deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)