Talk:tener que

RFD discussion: July 2016–January 2017
I feel it is unusual to have tener que as a separate lemma. I'd prefer it merged into tener --P3459rgo0 (talk) 17:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's more like have to than think that since since the is not optional and changes the meaning. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Renard Migrant, then why does the conjugation template say "(without the "que")." I feel we should just extend tener with this definition, and say . MackyBlue11 (talk) 01:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The structure is similar to "have to". Should it go as well? --Hekaheka (talk) 00:06, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * User:MackyBlue11, it says "without the que" because our verb templates are not able to include other words than the verb. It would be better to link the conjugation to with: Conjugation of : see . —Stephen (Talk) 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge into tener. English is a special case because of the the non-SOP pronunciation. --WikiTiki89 14:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Merged into tener. bd2412 T 13:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)