Talk:testosterone-fueled

RFD discussion: April–December 2017
Unnecessary if fueled is adjectival and testosterone is understood to overpower rationality. — (((Romanophile))) ♞ (contributions) 02:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * It's an American spelling, so I've labelled it, whether it survives or not. DonnanZ (talk) 18:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Common collocation, but it does feel somewhat SoP to me, like a booze-fuelled party or a hate-fuelled rant. Equinox ◑ 17:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Neither nor  are entered as adjectives. I don't see any harm in keeping this. DonnanZ (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Fueled/fuelled is a part participle. All past participles are potentially adjectival in English. DCDuring (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I came across an interesting one this morning - "railway-fuelled building", referring to development spurred by the building of a railway in the 19th century. DonnanZ (talk) 11:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * To me this is a keep as a single (hyphenated) word. Ƿidsiþ 06:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * : delete as SOP. Kiwima (talk) 04:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Transparent use of fueled in a compound. It might be useful to include testosterone-fueled in a usage example at [[testosterone]], shere the search engine would find it for a language learner. DCDuring (talk) 12:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. --Barytonesis (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 03:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)